Heyman's essay appeared to have a similar shape to the classical model when organizing her information. The majority of it was narration however, giving the audience and idea about what they're talking about in detail. The Myths section did seem to be a huge refutation section, showing the counterargument to emphasize her position. This argument seems to contain mostly facts, meant mostly for informing others and helping them understand her point of view on the topic.
Since it contains mostly facts and description, the most prevailing pattern would be narration with a bit of description.
No comments:
Post a Comment